Practice Areas

We turn your patents into revenue. We have obtained court awards, settlements and licensing deals for our patent-owner clients in cases before district courts around the country and the International Trade Commission. And we have represented large and small companies, startups, solo inventors, and non-practicing entities. We’ve taken cases to trial and argued before the Federal Circuit. The attorneys on our team have relevant technical backgrounds in electrical engineering, computer science, networking, integrated and semiconductor chip technologies, biomedical, chemical and mechanical engineering, medical devices, biology and chemistry. Our experience is also international in scope – our attorneys have managed the filing of lawsuits in Australia, Brazil, China, England, France, Germany, India, Romania and Spain.

We put our fees at risk and offer contingency billing arrangements. We’ve also structured cases where clients pay costs and we work on a full contingency basis, or where our fees are highly discounted and capped. We have relationships with litigation funders as well, giving us the ability to craft the best funding approach for the particular client and patent portfolio at hand. And we partner with patent prosecution firms for clients with continuing prosecution and open portfolios.

Examples of our successful representations are:

Represented an Israeli startup against web services and search engine providers in Delaware. The asserted patents related to technology providing previews of search results.

Represented a software development company in litigations in Delaware against more than 15 defendants, including some of the largest software companies in the world. The asserted patents covered technology for backup and restore software. 

Represented a software developer against over 30 laptop, router, semiconductor, and handset makers. The asserted patents covered technology that facilitated program-controlled, direct transfer of data along a bus or data pathway between peer input/output devices in a data-processing apparatus or data-processing network. 

Represented an electronics component manufacturer in its ITC action against a multinational semiconductor company on patents related to silicon microphone packages. The client was able to obtain a partial limited exclusion order due to this lawsuit.

Represented a hardware design company against a manufacturer of an activity tracking device on patents covering wearables technology.

Represented a generic drug company in a Hatch-Waxman litigation involving a four-billion dollar drug product where our client prevailed at trial, launched its drug at risk, won on appeal and generated hundreds of millions of dollars in sales in a contingency profit-sharing fee arrangement.

Our current cases include:

Densys Ltd. v. 3Shape Trios A/S and 3Shape A/S, 6:19-cv-00680 (WD TX)

DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC v. Apple Inc. et al., 6:22-cv-00533 (WD TX)

DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., 6:22-cv-00535 (WD TX)

Exafer Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 1:20-cv-00131 (WD TX)

Jeffrey Gelfand, MD v. Acumed, LLC et al., 1:21-cv-01753 (D DE)

Lower48 IP LLC v. Shopify, Inc., 6:22-cv-00997 (WD TX)

Netsocket, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 2:22-cv-00172 (ED TX)

ParkerVision, Inc. v. MediaTek, Inc. et al., 6:22-cv-01163 (WD TX)

ParkerVision, Inc. v. NXP Semiconductors NV et al., 6:23-cv-00389 (WD TX)

ParkerVision, Inc. v. Realtek Semiconductor Corp., 6:22-cv-01162 (WD TX)

ParkerVision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd. et al., 6:20-cv-00945 (WD TX)

ParkerVision, Inc. v. Texas Instruments Incorporated, 6:23-cv-00384 (WD TX)

paSafeShare LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, 6:20-cv-00397 (WD TX)

SITO Mobile R&D IP et al. v. Hulu, LLC, 6:20-cv-00472 (WD TX)

Solstice Wireless LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al., 4:22-cv-00723 (ED TX)